Selected behaviours can be represented through definitions and examined using appropriate evidence. The Case of Honor demonstrates that translation. The resulting reading is an interpretation of evidence under a method, not a complete measure of a person or proof of moral worth. Read more.

No. It concerns patterns of practice and the conditions in which people act. It can complement compliance and governance work, but it does not certify legal compliance or replace qualified investigation, reporting and decision processes. Read more.

It presents interpretations and possible responses for responsible review. A pattern label is not a verdict about an individual. The organisation must govern the evidence, access, decisions and follow-up, especially where a conclusion could affect someone. Read more.

Yes. The method grows from HEPO's work on virtue, decay, ethical coherence and flourishing. The application makes those assumptions discussable through definitions and examples. The longer arguments belong in the Library; using the software does not require treating the example vocabulary as universal. Read more.

They illustrate questions about incentives, authority, voice and evidence in organisational failures. They are not a control group proving that HEPO would have prevented those outcomes. Use them to examine a mechanism and the limits of an explanation. Read more.

The solution offers an explicit example vocabulary with its philosophical origins. Your organisation decides whether and how to use or adapt it. Supplied definitions are a starting point for review, not an imposed moral standard. Read more.