Use an agreed handover plan covering access, credentials, data, definitions, licensing, operational knowledge and outstanding work. A change of partner should be planned; the architecture alone cannot promise uninterrupted service or particular contractual rights. Read more.

Shared Module, Code Factory and Common Canvas support different kinds of configuration, development and presentation. An extension still needs appropriate implementation, permission checks, integration review and validation before use. Choose the mechanism that fits the change. Read more.

Yes: define a limited question and scope, review the supplied definitions, connect the necessary evidence and establish a usable review or execution path. Inspect what the pilot can actually show before expanding its purpose or audience. Read more.

Bring a concrete situation and follow its inputs, actions, outputs and responsible decisions through a demonstration. Business reviewers can assess the offering; technical reviewers can inspect its records, deployment, permissions and integration effects. Read more.

Begin with the working question, stakeholders and deployment readiness. Review existing records and definitions, configure relevant integrations and processes, demonstrate the workflow, and prepare ownership and handover before live use. Read more.

Discuss licensing, delivery, hosting, integration, configuration, training and ongoing support against the proposed scope. The partner economics material explains the model; it is not a public price list or a promise of savings. Read more.